The Situation
This early-stage ProcureTech business had strong product momentum and growing interest from enterprise procurement teams, led by sharp, commercially minded founders who were very clear about what they wanted to hire. They knew the roles they needed, how they wanted to interview, and what “good” looked like at this stage of the business.
After recent investment, they wanted to hire quickly, but knew that a wrong decision would be costly, both financially and in terms of missed opportunity.
What they didn’t have was experience of hiring from the ProcureTech talent market.
The Hiring Brief
Two hires were prioritised:
- a senior, hands-on enterprise salesperson (individual contributor)
- a Commercial Excellence Manager to support repeatable customer value realisation.
The founders were deliberately open-minded about background and wanted to explore:
- people from their own founder and start-up networks, predominantly outside ProcureTech
- candidates with deep ProcureTech and procurement-domain experience
Their assumption was that the best hires might come from either pool. They wanted to compare properly and move fast without cutting corners.
How We Helped
Speed mattered, but not at the expense of judgement. We were able to move quickly because we already knew the right people. Every individual we introduced in this case was someone we had an existing relationship with, and we understood their track record, strengths, and where they were likely to struggle in an early-stage environment.
That depth comes from years spent focused on one market: building relationships through ProcureTech events, ongoing conversations, and long-term network cultivation. When we don’t already know someone, we know exactly where to look.
The founders had built a compelling vision and product, and invested time with us to clearly articulate that story. This meant we were able to engage high‑calibre candidates with a compelling narrative from the outset, which was then reinforced through the interview process and helped cement genuine excitement among candidates who could genuinely move the business forward.
Alongside candidate access, the founders used us as a sounding board. They asked a lot of questions. They pressure-tested their own thinking. We shared examples of decisions we’ve seen other founders get right, and wrong, at similar stages.
That helped them move forward with confidence.
What Changed
As the process unfolded, the quality of candidates surfaced changed the original plan.
Two senior, proven individual contributor sales profiles emerged. Different styles. Complementary strengths. Both capable of making an immediate impact without management overhead, each independently meeting the bar for this stage, which led the founders to recognise an opportunity rather than forcing a choice or sticking rigidly to the original scope.
They made three hires instead of two.
This wasn’t indecision. It was a deliberate decision driven by strength.
The Outcome
Following the hires:
- commercial execution capacity increased immediately
- ownership across sales and commercial operations became clearer
- the founders were able to refocus time on higher-value priorities
Reflecting on the process, one founder commented:
“You redefined what I believed was possible from a recruitment business.”
Why This Matters
Early-stage ProcureTech companies rarely struggle because of ambition or clarity, but because hiring decisions are made without enough market context.
This case shows what happens when strong founder judgement is combined with deep, market-specific hiring experience.
The result wasn’t just faster hiring. It was better decisions — and a better outcome than originally planned.